This is the LICC Connecting with Culture comment for May 22... (I added the cartoon)
‘I think it is a dreadful example of the House of Commons as a whole - which as a whole is responsible for the mess we are in - trying to scapegoat one man who was trying to represent what he thought were their views on what should be done.’
Frank Dobson certainly isn’t alone in detecting a whiff of hypocrisy in this week’s tumultuous and historic events at Westminster, which saw Michael Martin become the first Speaker of the House of Commons in more than 300 years to be effectively forced out of office.
There is, however, another scapegoat in the current crisis over MPs’ expenses, one on which everyone seems eager to lay their hands: the system. The applause that greeted Speaker Martin’s later (and longer) statement to the Commons last Tuesday, in which he outlined interim changes to the parliamentary expenses claims system, is indicative of the honourable members’ conviction that the system needs to change.
There is now cross-party agreement that MPs should no longer be able to claim for, among other things: mortgages that don’t exist, homes they do not live in, and houses in which their ducks do.
This is tragic.
In other words, the real problem here is what the Bible calls sin.
To cast the present scandal in terms of the words of Jesus, it is from within, out of the heart, that greedy expenses claims come (Mark 7:20-23). Making a scapegoat of the system may be to join the Pharisees in cleaning ‘the outside of the cup and dish’, but inside remaining ‘full of greed and self-indulgence’ (Matthew 23:25). The system, like the Daily Telegraph, can expose sin, but it can’t do anything about it. Only Christ can do that. Ultimately, there is no solution to the scandal of MPs’ expenses apart from the scandal of the cross.
Not that we should sit in judgement. The current crisis begs the question of our own integrity. Be it in regard to our own work expenses, or anything else, we must all contend with the truth that our actions betray our allegiance. As we do so, we might find we have more in common with the Commons than we thought.
Nigel Hopper
‘I think it is a dreadful example of the House of Commons as a whole - which as a whole is responsible for the mess we are in - trying to scapegoat one man who was trying to represent what he thought were their views on what should be done.’
Frank Dobson certainly isn’t alone in detecting a whiff of hypocrisy in this week’s tumultuous and historic events at Westminster, which saw Michael Martin become the first Speaker of the House of Commons in more than 300 years to be effectively forced out of office.
There is, however, another scapegoat in the current crisis over MPs’ expenses, one on which everyone seems eager to lay their hands: the system. The applause that greeted Speaker Martin’s later (and longer) statement to the Commons last Tuesday, in which he outlined interim changes to the parliamentary expenses claims system, is indicative of the honourable members’ conviction that the system needs to change.
There is now cross-party agreement that MPs should no longer be able to claim for, among other things: mortgages that don’t exist, homes they do not live in, and houses in which their ducks do.
This is tragic.
It is tragic because such things shouldn’t have to be spelt out. The system, designed to ensure MPs aren’t left out of pocket for legitimate expenses incurred in the course of their work, isn’t the problem. The creation of such a system is good, very good. The problem is the selfishness and greed of those who abuse the system in order to fill their pockets. Justifying their actions with reference to the letter of the law, they wilfully disregard the spirit of the law.
To cast the present scandal in terms of the words of Jesus, it is from within, out of the heart, that greedy expenses claims come (Mark 7:20-23). Making a scapegoat of the system may be to join the Pharisees in cleaning ‘the outside of the cup and dish’, but inside remaining ‘full of greed and self-indulgence’ (Matthew 23:25). The system, like the Daily Telegraph, can expose sin, but it can’t do anything about it. Only Christ can do that. Ultimately, there is no solution to the scandal of MPs’ expenses apart from the scandal of the cross.
Not that we should sit in judgement. The current crisis begs the question of our own integrity. Be it in regard to our own work expenses, or anything else, we must all contend with the truth that our actions betray our allegiance. As we do so, we might find we have more in common with the Commons than we thought.
Nigel Hopper
